New forum topicsSponsorUser loginEsp/EngDar la suave a unoTo polish the apple Active forum topicsRecent blog posts
Recent comments
Currency Rate
|
Canada screwing up Latin AmericaSubmitted by Jack Davies on 30 September, 2006 - 02:44.
( categories: )
|
NavigationWho's onlineThere are currently 3 users and 28 guests online.
Online users
Who's new
PollWhich location appeals most? Apartment in the city 2% Home in the city 11% Home in a small town 29% Rural or small farm 52% Big farm 6% Total votes: 62 A ThoughtA terrorist is someone who has a bomb but doesn't have an air force |
No Surprise
A relative of mine was involved with an Irish NGO a few years ago and did some development work in the area around the gold mines in the Department of León near Malpaisillo. These mines are owned and operated by Canadian companies, and some of the operating practices that I heard about are not extactly the type of image that Canada and Canadians would like to project to the rest of the world.
I am not surprised at all by this article.
the fewer these Corp fly the Canadian flag the better. . .
most corporations behaviour verges on the sociopathic - this documentary used the Psyhciatric Assoc definition of a sociopath, and as corporations are considered citizens - not surprisingly corp behaviour is almost textbook sociopath ( www.thecorporation.com ) . . . I'm neither ashamed or surprised as a Canadian, as a human, I'm embarassed at corporate behaviour . . . it's the national and international shareholders who should be ashamed . . . in this new world order corps are almost beyond most government scrutiny as long as they pretend to pay their taxes.
So judgmental
Is it sociopathic for a corporation to sell generic prescription drugs for $4, and for all your competitors to lower their prices to match?
I said almost . . . I'm a corporation Arlington, Inc.
I said almost . . . I'm a corporation Arlington Graphic Design Communications, Inc., neither sociopathic ni schizophrenic ; )
but . . . but . . .
no mention of whether or not you are cleptomaniac. ;)
I have been known to . . .
I have been known to . . . pick up business, if I see it lying around and no ones looking ; )
arlington
I watched the movie "Arlington Road" on TV today. Is that where you got your screen name?
Jeff Bridges who was the main star in it was raised here in Eureka. The Bridges family lived in the Vance Hotel on 2 St. It was called Two Street then and still is. It is the main street in the remodeled Old Town but it used to be the heart of the red light district.
To get a little more side-tracked: I didn't like the way that movie ended with the terrorists winning. When I was a kid the good guys wore white hats and always won. They set a good example. Its no wonder so many kids go wrong these days, the movies don't have the right endings.
Grandfather's first name
saw the movie, don't recall it. Sometimes the terrorists do win, sometimes the terrorists are the good guys . . . Washington was an insurgency leader. Gandhi was a rebel leader. One day the neo-cons willl be seen as the forces of repression and rolling back the consitution with the radical religious in the US seen as the taliban they are.
Arlington's view of 21st century conservatism?
George Washington = Osama bin Laden
Southern Baptist Convention = Taliban
"Neo-cons" = Stalin/Hitler/Hussein/fill in the blank
No one can say I was wrong about how the "neo-left" twists language to demonize the right. What was that post about the death of common sense?
twisting language and logic
is an interesting 'I'm purer than you' game used by neo conservatives to discredit alternative views of reality.
Hmmm...
Sounds like the question, "Define the universe and give two examples." The left's reality is better than the right's reality.
well if there are two realities . . .
well if there are two realities . . . I must be a stranger in a strange land . . . how the heck to I get back to my preferred reality . . . I've done the clicking the heels together but that only gets me to Kansas, and they're messed up too ; )
http://www.dissidentvoice.org/June04/Frank0614.htm
i read it for a while....
"Today Kansas is the sort of place where the angry, suspicious worldview typified by Fox News or the books of Ann Coulter is a common part of everyday life. So I went there to study the indignant conservative mindset up close."
nope, no bias there. good thing i don't live in kansas, i'd have to get angry, suspicious, indignant ......
or i could be happy and have higher taxes? are those the choices?
Why read it - just another liberal hit piece.
Well, I don't live in Kansas but I do get angry, suspicious, and indignant when politicians think they know best how I should live my life. Our city council outlawed building airplanes in our garages at home, but is now considering allowing zoning exemptions to keep chickens and roosters in the yard.
That's a good link. Jim and
That's a good link. Jim and John and a who know's who ain't gonna click it though.
interesting point John
but following your argument, wouldn't it equally be logically correct to say "The right's reality is better than the left's reality"?
Logic and reason are linear Western concepts
And it depends on who's speaking, of course.
Arlington can move to Cuba or Venezuela to live his preferred reality.
The "America ... love it or leave it" argument
sounds quixotically Nixonian. Moving to Venezuela or Cuba, or Timbukoo, for all of that,to escape the problems of the status quo only exacerbates those problems, unless of course, one wants to insist that the status quo is now a chaste reborn virgin, and free of sin.
It's a mad mad mad mad world
Arlington is the Canadian who seemed interested in leaving America for his own peronal utopia, not me :-)
If you lived in Saudi Arabia and they told you to love it or leave it, what would you do?
if I was Saudi Arabian
I'd grit my chompers and try to change the system within. That's what all patriots do, whether left or right. If I was a foreign guest in Saudi Arabia, I think I would keep my mouth shut, and let the Saudis shape their society in whatever way they want
Swoosh, Three points
Bravo, edward1, excellent point. A valid, concise, thought-provoking AND patriotic remark.
i thought he proved our point?
he would be incredibly brave and buck the wave of jihad?
I don't think it's so much a question of bravery
as it is an unwillingness to accept perceived injustice(s)no matter one's political stance on the political spectrum. It is because men sat idly, cowering, that for the better part of the last century most of Latin America endured insufferable dictatorships, almost all of them supported and financed by Washington and its diverse covert agencies. It is when men stood up to be counted that we are now fundamentally free of these scourges to human rights in this hemisphere. Even Washington, which had strayed so significantly from its own Declaration of Rights now is an arch enemy to political movements whose sole goal is authoritarianism. The overthrow of those dictatorial regimes may not have resulted in flawless political systems. But they are better than what preceded them. Even President Castro, despite being perceived a persona non grata by Washington for over fifty years, brought significant social justice to Cuba: the first Latin nation to achieve full literacy, universal health care, among other rights which universally are all men's rights, or should be. One may detest his regime's economic policies, among other scources of disagreement, but the Cuba of today is better off than the wh...house it was under Batista, whose army it should be recalled was the best armed in the Spanish America's. Don't misconstrue the comments above as pro-communist, or anti American. If there is perceived injustice, regardless of whether one is a neo conservative or neo liberal, there will be men who will not idly sit back. That is not unabashed bravery. That is a belief in the cause of righteousness, and a willingness to struggle for it.
very well written if that style of gov't
is your cup of tea. errrrr, uhhhhhhh, a minor correction, castro is a dictator, he took power at the end of the gun. at least ortega held free elections. i suspect there were atrocities committed by both batista and castro regimes. and no freedom yet.
Cuban social justice
The ultimate oxymoron.
OH?
There were once three men who saw for the first time a real elephant. Guy A said, "I see before me the grandeur of God's magnificence." Guy B said, "No, you're wrong. I see before me a fortune in ivory." Guy C says "You're both wrong. I see before me the greatest challenge to hunt in the field." I guess it all depends, John, on how one 'prefers' to interpret what is obvious before them. Think it's time to go and make myself some chili relenos.
We've done the Cuba thing on NL before
You believe what you want.
http://www.nicaliving.com/node/5373
The "America ... love it or leave it" argument
sounds quixotically Nixonian. Moving to Venezuela or Cuba, or Timbukoo, for all of that,to escape the problems of the status quo only exacerbates those problems, unless of course, one wants to insist that the status quo is now a chaste reborn virgin, and free of sin.
or Nicaragua
or Nicaragua . . . sounds nice.
Canadian striptease
This thread started out about Canada so I may as well end it that way.
You have all seen Jay Leno's street interviews, maybe he should do one in Toronto.
http://video.google.com/videouploadfinished?docid=876203443230112492&fil...
This video played okay when I opened it but now it is jerky and slow to download even on broadband. Maybe too many people just turned there TV's on. Sorry about that. Just skip the last 1/3 of it.