Nicaraguans Outside Nicaragua, Where?

I am wondering if there is any sort of data or research or whatever, into the most common places (cities) for Nicaraguans to be living and working, outside of Nicaragua?

I assume the southern U.S. is at the top, but was curious about the actual cities. I recently came across a stat from some Honduran government agency which claimed that not that long ago, New Orleans had the third largest population of Hondurans in the world, and Atlanta was fifth (in Honduras, San Pedro Sula and the capital Tegucigalpa are of course 1 and 2). Is there any related figure for Nicaragua?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

By the way where Nicas are?

Particularly here in Los Angeles, it feels like there is a very low population of Nicas. I was in houston in June, there is definetly alot of Nicas there like 5,000. And the Michael Cordua (one of Nicaragua's best chefs) has restaurants there.

My Opinion

I can't help to be attached to the United States as well. I was raised here since age 1. I am now 20. I know more U.S than Nicaragua. And in this country I can say that I have experienced racism in slight degrees, and even being ostracized by my own Latin community. For example, Americans always assuming one is Mexican, speaks Mexican, and knows what hot sauce goes on what food. Also Mexicans poking fun at me because my accent in Spanish is distinct from them, and I come off as hard headed for not changing my accent. I tell them I say "vos" because that's normal to me and that is how I was raised. I don't tell you to say "vos", I am okay with you saying "tu". For Nicas, you know what I am talking about. And also talking about how Mexico has more beaches, hotels etc... Who cares???? I personally love all countries, even Costa Rica, but the people who reside in these countries make me wonder if I really want to go there. I had been dying to go to Costa Rica, but I am not going to spend $$$ to get insulted for who I am. Besides I am really happy because I am moving to Nicaragua on September 28 of this year (2005) I am going to see how it will go for me there, I am even planning to study at UCA in Managua. I am going to get a Licenciatura en Ensenanza de Ingles. In the end of this process, if uninterrupted, I plan to travel the world, or return to the U.S (since I am a citizen), but to me the U.S is not the only great country in the world. There are over 235, and each has it's own uniqueness, whether it is coffee, beef, or women who wear 2 foot stacks of rings on their necks.

article in the new york times.

I know some people might say this is a nica living site but since the topic of immigration and restaurants were being discussed. Here is an article I found

http://www.nytimes.com/pages/national/class/index.html?hp

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/26/national/class/MEXICANS-FINAL.html

Disregard all Definitions of Everything!

(1) I am not the "Web Police" on "Nica Living"; but, according to the definition of a forum topic on this website is the following: A forum topic is to ask a question and get answers via "add comment". 90% of the comments here have no answers to the original topic nor even relate to the original topic. The topic was changed to become an "Illegal Immigrant" forum topic. These posts bear no revelance to the original forum topic.

(2) Someone should post a new "Illegal Immigrant" forum topic and people can post as to their reasons why the laws of the USA are wrong. I would never violate any Nicaraguan law and I do not understand how people can uphold the violation of U.S. laws especially when those same people seem to want to be in the USA. A law is a law in Nicaragua and the U.S. and the other countries of the world. It is quite different to advocate changes in laws; but, to support violation of laws is simply wrong.

Inmigration law ?

It was changed because probaly its a big topic it its actually a big thing going on right know in the US,the ill treatment of what is called "illigal alliens" just that they are not called illigal imigrants aparentlly they are not human beens, or they are not seen like human been in the US thats what they call us in the US, and that society will continue arguing that is nothing but a racist war, personally for me it is a hollocaust, but all I get is get the f out of here then. personally I dont feel been treated like a human been in the USA. Im sure you will say too, get the f out of here, or out of there whats wrong with criticizing for turning america into a better country? .

Holocaust, my ass

Please ... Comparing people who disregard national boundaries and work illegally in the country of another, to a holocaust, is about as pathetic as it gets. Do you even know what the holocaust was? If every document and every person in the U.S. switched from the phrase "illegal alien" to "undocumented worker", would that satisfy you? Of course not. It has nothing to do with treating people as if they were not a human being (if people do not treat you well, maybe it is because they are tired or hearing nonsense about racism and persecution). If you are wronged or hurt by people in the U.S., report it to the police (local police cannot, in most locales, contact INS/ICE anyway). Unless you go around telling people you are not in the country legally, how would they know? Your ultimate concern is not language, but having a better life in a country to which you have absolutely no right (to be there). I am not even a U.S. citizen, but sympathize when anyone there who is not thrilled with ideas of open borders. How is it, precisely, that America would become a better country, via illegal immigration? Better for whom?

yes!

completly agree, adrian!!! come on people! seriously, you cant talk crap about a country, when you are living there, working there, enjoying the pleasures of being american (usa), if you are illegal, how can you talk crap about it? it's not right, i completely 100% disagree with being illegal... to any country, i have several friends in usa who are illegal, i'm still there friend, but if they ask then i will tell them the truth of what i feel about being illegal, i'm legal when in usa and nica, i have my right papers, and i just dont think of it logical for people to talk about the country where they live and work illegally, or then why are they even there? why dont they stay in their country? no offense intended, i have no problem with going to other country, but i think it should be done legally. seriously, please dont be offended, lorena

Esteli--Maybe a Sheltered Life.

Possibly, my problem is that I have been very lucky to lead a sheltered life in Nicaragua for the last 14 years. I have enjoyed the respect of the Nicaraguan people and I have respected the Nicaraguan people. I have never had any problems on the Pacific or the Atlantic Coasts. Your past posts have always been fair and interesting. Possibly, soon you can come back to Nicaragua to live.

You state that the "illegal immigrant" problem is a big thing in the USA now and you should know better than me. I have two questions for you. (#1) In your opinion, do the "legal immigrants" have problems in the USA as you state that the "illegal immigrants" have many problems? (2) Do you personally have everyday problems in Salt Lake City because you are an immigrant? I would think that Salt Lake would be one of the best places to live in the USA because of the Mormon influence.

Your last sentence states "whats wrong with criticizing for turning america into a better country"? Nothing wrong with that! As I stated in my post: People should advocate a change in bad or unjust laws; but, not advocate the violation of laws. I believe this for the USA, for Nicaragua, and for any other country of the world.

I am Confused!

In several of the below posts--I see that some people can identify illegal immigrants by eating at a restaurant, passing by a construction site, or gazing at someone's garden. How does one tell the difference between a "legal immigrant" and an "illegal immigrant"? Please advise!

I have a friend in Corn Island who has been a citizen of Nicaragua for his 70 odd years. This man has no "Creole" or Hispanic features in appearance; but, is very "clear" in color. When this man goes to Managua; the dentist, doctor, and taxis (ect.) try to charge him "Gringo" prices. The Immigracion in Managua always check this gentleman very closely. How does anyone look at someone and know their citizenship or immigration status?

you can tell very easy

By talking to people and learning about their background you can find out. If people find you trustworthy they will tell you. Beside in the USA we live in a wonderfully racist country, I am an US Citizen born in Nicaragua, and I can sense the descrimination where I live. TO a lot of people it does not matter if you are a legal immigrant or not, they are all the same, foreigners invading their country.It might be confusing to understand something you have never experience, some people are not very perceptive including my friend who claims black people are not treated different in this country. what a joke!!

In regards to another comment in this thread, in my case, I criticize this country and some of its laws because I love it just as much as I love Nicaragua. There is absolutely nothing wrong with pointing out the errors or faults. The problem is when you pretend as if you live in paradise when you don't. Things cannot be fixed if you fail to see what is wrong with them.

In my experience as an immigrant, many people has tried to put me down and explicitly state that they think I am stupid because of my origin, luckily for me I have a strong sense of self and try not to fall into the stereotypes or images others have about me. Sadly, there are young people out there who are very vulnerable and start believing what others think about them, they become ashamed of their origin or background (many kids in school pretend they don't speak Spanish when they do) some are treated as criminals and become criminals etc..

Please note that I am not following any argument here, just stating what I think.

I am an immigrant and I do not face discrimination

Lola -

Sorry for your experience. I have lived in Florida, Louisiana, and Texas and have not seen any discrimination at all. A few times people have said mean things about my background, but they were just jerks that did not represent society.

When I came to the US from Nicaragua, I remember that Nicaraguan society was closed to people from other countries. I had friends who had been in Nicaragua for generations and they were still referred to as "the Chinese" or "the Jew". Americans were always referred to as "El gringo" this, and "el gringo" that. I did not see that here.

I had the good fortune of not suffering any ill will from anyone in this country. As a matter of fact, I have been assimilated completely and my friends admire my duality in culture and language. I never try to hide or not mention what I am, and never will. I still can't believe how great Americans have been to me, and how they respect me for who I am. The majority of my friends are Americans from all walks of life, as well as other Latinos. My best friends are a cajun from Louisiana, a Texan from East Texas, and a true southerner from Northeast Louisiana.

I have, however, seen discrimination here. I have seen discrimination of blacks against mexican immigrants, and Mexicans against Central American immigrants. Everyone tends to discriminate a little bit outside of their culture. But I have never seen any rooted racism like most people imagine.

Now, for illegal immigration: well, that's just wrong! You can't expect to have people who come into a country uninvited, breaking its laws, and being totally welcome. That's crazy. I once overstayed a business trip to Mexico and it was not a pretty sight. And the interrogation that you get flying into Mexico with a Nicaraguan passport is not pretty either.

When people's way of life is changed by things that they can't control by people who are breaking the law, those people are going to be upset, it's just natural. It's not that they hate Latinos, is that the illegals come in without any system of checks to make sure that the "wrong" people don't get in. The newspapers are littered with examples of Latinos who commit capital crimes in the US only to run to Mexico for safe heaven. In a controlled immigration environment, those criminals would not get into the country.

I think the legal immigrant community also needs to step up and help curve this wave of illegal immigration that is going to harm us all.

Until legal immigrants, especially those who claim to love the US, stand up and shout "enough", and quit providing safe-haven for illegals, then we are all going to be put in the same bucket and we will all suffer the consequences.

Now, for the discrimination part. If you are looking for examples of discrimination, you will find it on all sides. I was almost beat up once by a racially charged crowd in New York city by several Al Sharpton look alikes. I know people in the (legal) immigrant community of Central Americans that have been totally discriminated against by the Mexican immigrant community. And I have seen discrimination of blacks vs. anglos, and anglos vs. blacks. What I have not seen is open discrimination of the American system towards any one group, especially blacks.

To anyone who claims blacks are treated differently, I agree: They are less than 15% of the population, and for all intents and purposes control an entire political party, have control over the political process, and control a significant amount of the popular culture. In a country where 15% of the population has that much control, you would be hard pressed to make an argument that such country is racist against that group.

And if you think that is a racist statement, then you must blame my friend, a black guy from Texas who made that observation to me.

I don't know about you, but maybe I have been lucky, maybe I have lived in great places, or maybe, just maybe, its my attitude...

Reply to Somebody Else!

Lola -- Those posts that I was replying to were people saying that they could tell "illegal immigrants" by looking at the workers in restaurants or working on construction sites, or working in gardens.

Then, you talk about checking backgrounds and so and so. Nothing to do with what I posted.

I said nothing about racism. You need to start your own "forum topic" on that subject. I too, am stating what I think. ____________________________________________________________________

Most People Don't See

Lola, I've lived in places where the population is largely hispanic, and places were hispanics are the minority. In both, I have discovered that most people do not look at someone with brown skin (or light for that matter) and think they're here illegally. I've even had people tell me that they didn't even know there were illegal immigrants in the Pacific NW. Usually what brings the situation to light is a high profile crime, otherwise they don't think that guy trimming the trees, picking apples, or the nice one with the accent working at the bank might not have his green card.

Having talked about "regular" people, I won't lie, I do believe there are others more "enlightened," who might be able to "tell." Especially those who deal with illegal immigrants frequently, and can tell you by the clothes the person's wearing (if he hasn't been here long), by his name, by his accent where he's from in Mexico, Guatemala, etc. Or by looking at his tattoos tell you what gang he's a member of...I'm sure I'm stirring up a hornet's nest with that one!

The thing is though, I bet you that even some of the expats down in Nicaragua can still spot a gringo if they were shopping in the market, and after having heard him say a few things, offer up a good guess as to where he's from if he's got a regional accent. If he's wearing a Dallas Cowboy cap and has a little twang, then ya'll might could guess he's from Texas and fixin' ta head back to tha hotel.

Good point

I understand what you are saying and my comment has nothing to do with being more "enlightened" as you put it, Let me give you a specific example to illustrate what I mean. The other day a mexican woman, who I have not met before came to give an estimate for some work, she gave me the estimate and started talking, she told me that she has been here for 3 years...that she was having difficulty buying something because she did not have papers, she talked about her children, the city where she used to lived, her previous job etc. She felt very comfortable sharing stuff with a stranger (me) perhaps because we are both from Latin America. I bet, that this woman has been working with other North American customers for more than a year and has never shared the information she shared with me.

Whenever I go eat out, I usually talked to the people who is making my food, especially if they are "Latinos" and if I visit the place often. I do have to say I am really good at recognizing different accents just like you mentioned you could recognize someone from Texas. I also believe that to a lot of North American people it does not really mattter if you are legal or not you are a foreigner and get the same treatment regardless.

I am also living in the NorthWest and it is pretty hard to miss when for example most people behind a wendy's counter is someone from South America. It is hard to believe that some people are so clueless, judgin by the comment: "I've even had people tell me that they didn't even know there were illegal immigrants in the pacific NW". Do these people really belive that an US born person or legal would take a job picking apples for example an live under some really hard conditions knowing that they could get an easier better paying job?

Denial

Lola, that's the only reason I can come up with--denial. Or they chose to think that the Agricultural program still exists and that all the people in the Strawberry fields are doing so legally. Or maybe they don't care until they do something "bad." Quien sabe?!

However, to some people if you say you can tell the guy behind the counter at Burger King is from Honduras, they will say you are stereotyping...or a racist.

Miskito Alan, all I am saying

Miskito Alan, all I am saying is that it is easy to find out. Perhaps it is becasue I speak Spanish that it is really easy to establish communication with Spanish speaking people...sometimes I meet people and in the first 5 minutes they tell me how long they lived here and they feel comfortable talking about their status here in the USA. I guess is a cultural thing. Latinos are more informal with other Latinos.

In places like LA, It is obvious to see because in general an US born person would not be working at a fast food for example for $6.00 an hour specially in areas where renting a one bedroom apartment costs around $800.00. There are so many more and better opportunities for people if they only spoke English. In general Latinos don't mind sharing a room, in fact they like to be around people and for the most part don't need as much space as people born in the US do. Again I am generalizing here but the difference in the cultures is a factor.

Nicaraguan & Hondurian Population in USA.

I have often wondered about the most popular metro areas in the USA for Nicaraguans and Hondurians; but, I had never researched the subject. The source of the year 2000 census figures below are from censusscope.org. I was quite surprised about a number of the ranked metro areas. I thought Tampa/St. Pete would be on the "Top 10" list. I had assumed that New Orleans would make a very strong showing. Houndarians outnumber Nicaraguans in Houston by 3-1. I was surprised by the fact that San Francisco/Oakland has only 3,700 Hondurians; but, that metro area is ranked #2 for the Nicaraguan people. Taca flies to Boston; but that city is only #10 for Honduranians and not on the Nicaraguan list.

Nicaraguans ---------------- "Top 10 List" ------ Honduranians

(1)-72,526 -- Miami ------------------------------- (1)-50,106 -- New York City (2)-27,523 -- San Francisco/Oakland --------- (2)-30,726 -- Miami (3)-26,447 -- Los Angeles ---------------------- (3)-23,669 -- Los Angles (4)-11,560 -- New York City -------------------- (4)-14,456 -- Houston (5)--6,884 -- Washington D.C. ----------------- (5)-11,319 -- Washington D.C. (6)--3,507 -- Houston ---------------------------- (6)--8,112 -- New Orleans (7)--3,305 -- Ft. Lauderdale -------------------- (7)--5,874 -- Chicago (8)--2,485 -- New Orleans ---------------------- (8)--5,364 -- Dallas (9)--1,959 -- West Palm/Boca ------------------ (9)--5,348 -- Jersey City (10)-1,465 -- Chicago --------------------------- (10)-5,032 -- Boston

157,661 Total of Above ------------------------- 160,038 Total of Above

177,684 Total in USA ---------------------------- 217,569 Total in USA

Census and Stats

It is possible that your initial assumption regarding Tampa is correct, even though the census stats do not confirm it. While it might not still be a problem, the U.S. (and any country with many legal and illegal immigrants) has always had difficulty gathering good, complete numbers on both legal and illegal people in any given area. Also, many Hispanic people -legal and illegal- in the U.S. avoid or do not particpate in many surveys, or many things connected to the government. Even those who do participate, many might not report the truth regarding household size, due to the fact that there may be people there on a regular or part-time basis, who are not in the country legally. The census info, even if used only as a guide, surprises me a little too. Everything I have ever seen regarding stats on Hondurans abroad was that New Orleans, Houston, and NY were always the three most populated cities or regions for Hondurans in the U.S. As recently as 2003 I saw stats from some agency of the Americas where New Orleans was listed as having more than 33,000 Hondurans, but I have no way to confirm the number, nor do I now how it was compiled. I have also seen 2002 stats indicating that there are/were more Nicaraguans in Florida and California, than in all the other U.S. States, combined.

Carina: Consider the Following!

If one is researching a subject; the best available data must be used and in this instance, the last U.S. Census in the year 2000 was used for statistical purposes. That data is all that I know to use for my research. If you have any other links to this data; please advise.

As to your point about the illegal immigrants not being counted; you must consider this point of mine. Let's just use this example: If 40% of the total USA population is living in Miami; I feel that we could be safe in saying that around 40% of the illegal Nicaraguan immigrants also live in Miami. I can not possibly see 40% of the Nicaraguan illegal immigrants living in Seattle, for example, where the counted Nicaraguan population is very low. Would you agree with this point?

You are very correct about Nicaraguan immigrants living in California and Florida outnumbering the total of the Nicaraguan immigrants living in the other areas of the USA. In my survey of "Top 10 Metro Areas", Florida and California (L.A., S.F./Oak., Miami, W. Palm/Boca, and Ft. Lauderdale) totalled 131,760 Nicaraguans leaving 45,924 dispersed throughout the other areas of USA out of a total Nicaragua population in the USA of 177,684.

Data

The Census data may be the most recent data (I am not an expert on that, but believe you). I do not have a competing weblink to post, and do not dispute the numbers they gathered. The other numbers I have seen come from the respective governments (Honduras, Nicaragua, etc.), and some might be "guesstamates", or however you call it. In many cases, a consulate in the U.S. may or will have a better grasp of the totals of their citizens in a specific area in the U.S., than non-Census U.S. agencies. The numbers I saw were in a magazine article from Taca Airlines, and also in tourism and NGO data from the Government, but I cannot now find a website with this same data. I suspect you are right about the numbers / %`s for illegal people, if they are undocumented, but would only point out that Florida and NY are often "starter cities" for illegals; they often live there the first year or more, via contacts, then move on to a city with a better job. I was told again, yesterday, by someone who worked the last 3 years in the Tourism Board here, that the Honduran government still considers New Orleans THE city of destination for workers, and bases this on consulate-correspondence, addresses on document authentication, and deportation data, but again there does not appear to be an official pronouncment I can find on any website, though if I locate it, I will post it here. It is however possible they are using some other unspecified criteria, or that it is simply bad statistical gathering.

Places to Score the Flor de Cana

Most Nicas would tell you that the largest populations of Nicaraguans are in Miami and LA. Although up here in the Pacific NW, we are seeing more and more. We are also seeing a lot of Hondurans and El Sals--unfortunately a huge number of both are Mara Salvatrucha.

Mara Salvatrucha.

Yes, El Salvador and Honduras are enjoying our exported Mara Salvatrucha. Gangsters who have been in the US since they were babies, deported to countries where they had no family, roots, ties. Only to reform gangs, in the end turning bad situations worse for those people who must now endure their new imported violence.

Coming To America

Five people I’m friendly with have come to live in the United States in the last year. Two went to Houston, One to New York, One to Lexington, KY, One to Atlanta GA. All of them entered the US illegally; four of them are now working in regular jobs they obtained with bogus social security cards, forged drivers licenses, birth certificates. One friend tried to come here legally to visit the rest of his family, they had every intention of returning but after several attempts at 100.00 a pop (Now 150), several trips to Managua, Lots of paperwork, interviews their request for a tourist visa was denied. This I believe was because they were unable to show they had sufficient holdings in Nicaragua that would certainly make them want to return, thus move them from the default category of potential immigrant, which is assumed. You must prove you’re not of immigrant status before a visa will be issued.

All of these people (Thankfully decent people) waltzed across the border as if there was a big sign that said "Come on in". Many people started coming here under the impression that Bush is about to announce a amnesty program and work permits, but you have to already be here illegally to qualify.

One of my friends went to get a drivers license. They denied his applications because they said his social security card didnt look valid. They never bothered to check any of his other credentials. A few months ago, he told me he had a traffic accident. He presented the police officer with his Nicaraguan Drivers license. He was given a ticket for crossing the double yellow line and driving with out a valid US drivers license. I though for sure an exit visa was on the horizon as they would certainly catch him this time and deport him. He went to court and the case was dismissed because the officer wrote the wrong name in the wrong place on the report. He thanked the court and went home, driving his van. These people are all great folks; I really wish the best for everyone and certainly understand people wanting a better life for them, if that’s what they think the US brings them. What bothers me is that it’s easier to just walk across the boarder then it is to come here legally. They would have at least had his visa, photo, fingerprints and everything else on file, a deposit to fund the cost associated with finding him and deporting them, etc. But now the US has nothing and it shows what happens when you do things the right way.

If I know five people who just walked right on in, got jobs and melted away into the fabric, I can just imagine how many people are really streaming across.

As far as I can tell, there are very few places that folks from Central America are not going. On of my friends, lives with a big group of other illegal new americans, lives like a dog, sends all the money he makes home and when he reaches that sweet spot, he's going home, buying a nice chunk of land, a house and he is going to retire.

It’s amazing....

Coming To America

I am not sure what your point is Pete, I get mixed messages from reading your post. I remember reading the New York time headline last week about undocumented workers contributing 7 billion dollars to social security anually and not getting any benefits from it due to the fact they work with fake ss#. I get the impression many white people have this sense of superiority becasue so many people from other countries are trying to go the USA, especially when I read your comment about the big sign saying come on in.Well, I do have a few things to say about that. The first thing being that the USA is an immigrants' country. Did the native Americans have a big sign for the new comers? "Come on in, Kill us and take our land". The native Americans did not called the new commers "illegals". As a relatively new immigrant to the USA myself, I take pride in the fact that I did not have to kill anyone to be here, I also did not steal other people's land or have become rich by enslaving others. I remember reading in my sociology textbook about 10 years ago that the USA has about 27 % of the population in the world and holds about 70 % of the wealth. I am not sure how accurate those numbers are but even if that was not the case, there is alot of waste in this country and a lot of need in other countries. Also some of the USA foreign policies are brutal and are responsible for some of the problems that countries like Nicaragua face today.

It comes down to people in the USA having a big piece of the pie and people in other places barely having any and asking you to share.

I really don't see why people are so worry and attached to their material things, I usually remind myself that after all, we are all just trying to survive, we are here on a temporal basis and those material things (land, money) stay here while we go.

Research

Lola, it does seem like you went a little off course...But since you went there...Speaking of sharing our pie, you might want to do some research on how much illegal aliens cost us taxpayers. I am not talking about the ones who come over and try their best to make something out of themselves either, because I know PLENTY of those. However, check into the amounts we pay to support the other ones: food stamps, housing assistance, hospital bills, and yes, even the amount we fork over to keep them in prison, and to deport them.

Yes, we are a nation of immigrants, but how long can we afford support those who come in solely to mooch? Some of us work awfully hard to make this country what it is.

In the end it all evens out.

Two different issues here, either way it all evens out.

Illegal aliens,

I always hated that word, as if they come from another planet not country. They do not get food stamps and housing assistance, you're thinking about born citizens on welfare and even if it is their children who get such benefits, they are entitled to them since they were born here as many others from different ancestry. Everyone's parents most have been an illegal alient in this country at some point in time. And the money we spend to keep them in prison and to deport them comes out of the billions of dollars they pay to the state and the IRS from their paychecks besides the billions that go to SSA. And I for one (speaking as an immigrant myself) hate the fact that a lot of my hard earned money goes to sustain the lives of so many born citizens on welfare. What prevents those people from prosperity? the language, legal status, culture shock, etc. it has nothing to do with illegal immigration.

Second subject,

They come to America, illegally, work for a little while, hit that sweet spot then they take their money home and they retire. I hardly know of any Nicaraguan that came to the States, made the money, moved back to Nic. on a retirement status. In fact, all of the ones I know made their money, went back home and invested that money and are now working citizens. The same is probably true for most people that move back to their respective countries I would imagine.

But what's the difference anyways, when the North american works his entire life really hard, makes his money, hits his own sweet spot, and the right age, then picks up and goes to Nicaragua or any other country in which he can live on a budget of no more than 25% that of the USA!

Either way it all even out and nobody is right, nobody is wrong and we all have to take the good and the bad of everything!!!

I Beg To Differ

A lot of "undocumented immigrants" certainly DO receive benefits. By law they should not, but they do.

And as far as the ones in prison, I would bet the majority never contributed one penny in taxes. I am not talking about Joe Blow Carpenter who gets thrown in prison for a DUI accident. I am talking about the Meth distributors, 17 year old bangers who shoot people, or maybe the sex offenders we can't send back to their countries because they won't accept them so they just keep re-offending.

What a lot of people don't realize is that for the most part north of the Southern Border, Immigration concentrates on criminal aliens--the ones already in jails and prisons. Unless they call negitive attention to themselves, the others working in agriculture, construction, and other perhaps well paying jobs are left alone. The bad apples end up costing us a ton.

Like I said before, I know plenty of good people living here illegally, but unfortunately I see some that would make your skin crawl knowing what they have been up to.

"Illegal Immigrants" Not "Illegal Aliens"

(Your 1st Subject) I agree with basically everything that you said on your post. "Illegal Aliens" sounds like "Invasion of Space Aliens". "Illegal Immigrants" or "Legal Immigrants" would be better choices of words. My 7th Great-Grandfather was captured in Scotland by the English with Lord General Cromwell in command in the "Battle of Dunbar" in 1650. 4,000 Scottish soldiers were killed and 6,000 soldiers were shipped by the English to the "New World". My 2nd Great-Grandmother was a full blooded Cheorkee Indian. My point is that all of us are a mixed-blood people and probably all of us have family that came to their respective countries under strange and difficult circumstances.

(Your 2nd Subject) On this Atlantic Coast, I see the movement of many Nicaraguan born people that left for the USA in the late 1970s or early 1980s and now those people have worked for 25 years there and are eligible to retire and are returning to the Atlantic Coast. I would imagine that the same trend is occurring on the Pacific Coast. With their retirement money and accumulated wealth; land will be bought, houses will be built, construction workers will be paid, food will be purchased, cable TV will be subscribed, LaPrensa will be bought daily, and all kinds of other economic benefits will occur in their respective local community.

Concerning your comment of the North Americans moving to Nicaragua and enjoying the low prices; I have been living most of my time for the last 14 years in Nicaragua because I love this country and most of the people. Oh! and by the way, the prices are not bad either -).

I agree with you that we must take the good with the bad; but let us all strive for the good and enjoy our lives.

Retire

Im sorry, there are a lot of people from Central And South America, who go to the states and send every nickle they make back home. Some do it because they need to support their families, but there are also those who go back home after breaking their backs for many years, and retire. And you know what... I never said there was anything wrong with that. They worked for it, so again ... why is everyone automaticly looking for the boogy "White Man" in my prior posting, get over it.

Not looking for anything to be wrong

I was simply stating the fact that we all do what we think is best for ourselves and families, whatever it takes.

I do agree that illegal means illegal but I also think that they deserve a brake, simply for the reasons they do what they do. And to be honest with you my comments had nothing to do with any race or skin color.

100% Agree

I would agree with this 100%, while they do exist, there are not many people that would do what ever was nessesary for thier families. In the United States and Nicaragua, unfortunately attitudes have a lot to do with skin color. I apologize as you have stated this was not your intention, I shouldnt have assumed.

Pete

What it is

Well, if the US would fork over the $16 billion in damages the World Court found they owed to Nicaragua for their war, maybe there would be less of an immigrant problem. And Nicaragua is only one such example.

Nica Living Urban Legend Alert

Come in from the cold war, the United States doesnt owe the Nicaraguan Goverment 16 Billion for the mining of Nicaragua's harbors, no matter how much everyone wants this to be true. During the administration of the Chamorro goverment, the United States forgave Nicaragua's debt, in turn the Chamorro administration said it was droping claim to the disputed order of the World Court.

Fork It Over

More then likely, if they forked it over, it would end up in the pockets of the same 1% of the people who have all the wealth now. Haiti just got a 1 Billion dollar package, lets see how much of that goes to improving things for the average Haitian, I bet it will only be cosmetic.

The Real Problem is Politics

Thanks for posting that reply about the 16 billion dollars in debt. Phil first mentioned it to me on my 1st post...I did not want to start an argument with him....but I just hope that "political agendas" are not the main motivation for people moving to Nicaragua. The country's biggest problem since day one has been the division of conservatives versus liberals and the solutions is to learn to live together! If they want to help the country then they should do it by helping the country heal not supporting a particular view...the Sandinistas are not angels...in fact that is why the country is the way it is...fact is...if a country the size of nicaragua goes against the United States it is bound to get hurt. Nicaragua has never been free, Ortega has been a pupped of Castro for a long time and Venezuela and Costa Rica HELPED start the revolution in Nicaragua because they hated Somoza. The Ticos are not angels either...Its a dog eat dog world. If internal divisions continue in Nicaragua more problems are bound to arise. For example, Nicaragua used to be much bigger, the east coast of Houndras used to be part of Nicaragua and Guanacaste up to the north part of Costa Rica was part of Nicaragua as well...guess how Nicaragua lost these territories - Civil War. Pete I dont know what your intentions are in this website but I hope your intentions are to help...Please Dont compare Nicaragua and Haiti....they are worlds apart.

Turning over stones looking for Mixed Messages

Mixed messages? Sounds like you’re looking for some, in order air your personal grievance. What I am baffled at is the fact that friends of mine go through all sorts of hoops trying to do things the right way and in the end, doing things illegally seem to be the only solution and a far easier way. While your observations might be some of the reasons these policies exist, you mistake is in trying to find the Evil “White Man” in between every sentence.

If you want some, in between the lines then, here goes. It was reflecting upon the fact that as of yesterday, I can’t bring a lighter on the plane and short of a regular cavity search, I cant “just get on” anymore. Its certainly about people trying to come here to seek what they think will be a better life, I said that. Its about all the “Weapons of Mass confusion”, "Terror" and that people are forced to come here illegally and can use simple forged documents, when the US government is talking about requiring passports to cross the Canadian and Mexican boarder at the legal checkpoints.

If you have an axe to grind with “The White People” and your perceived American Goverment plot, start a new thread. If anything, your posting has a message of opression based on skin color, and you pulled most of what you were saying, out of the thin air, not from my posting.

Comment on immigration

Pete, I don't think what I wrote was pulled out of thin air. I perceived your comment about the big sign saying "come on in" as very condescending of immigrants, most people who cross the border do it out of necessity, hoping for a better life not becuase they want to purposely break the laws of the USA. For the most part non-English speaking immigrants are seen as second class people, I see it everywhere, it is written in forums, on the news..etc. My comment was just a reminder of some factors that have shaped the USA that people forget.A lot of people speak as if they were in a higher moral position for being the "true Americans". I think they are only deceiving themselves, if you are not an immigrant your parents or grandparents or someone in your past generations were.

Chela, I was talking about sharing the pie that was stolen from the Native Americans and from the many other places that have been exploited, which nobody really own, the land the wealth in the world stays we go. A fact that most "American people" forget.

I undestand what you mean about the cost that illegal immigrants cause tax-payers, another way of looking at it would be that the hard working immigrants who pay taxes cover for the lazy ones who benefit from programs like welfare (do you also know that most people on welfare are white?), perhaps the taxes that you a "rightfull American" pay might be used for such things as spreading democracy by throwing bombs in places like Irak.

My point being that you work hard and pay taxes regardless of the illegal immigrants being in "your country". The money that you countribute as a taxpayer would be spend either way, if it is not spent in immigrant programs and education, it is spent in other stuff for example wars. Therefore that argument that the illegal immigrants cost you, which is also used by many people as reason to hate the new commers does not hold. As far as all the people in jail, I agree with you, it is not fair. It goes to show how inefficient the system is. Giving people life in prision sentences for selling drug seems ludrucuous, they should have better progams to rehabilate the people who commit minor crimes (like being addicted to drugs) and make it tougher for the real criminals in jail, make them work hard so they actually become afraid of going to jail rather than making them feel comfortable in there.

sorry but i agree with chela

sorry but i agree with chela on this one. it not being fair for us to support illegal immigrants on government money, even if there are more americans on it than foreign. however, lola, let's rephrase the statement " more white people are on welfare than hispanic" i believe that she read, "more black people are on welfare than hispanic" i disagree completely with people being lazy, not working yet receiving money, as if they were working, by us hard workers. i never will agree with that, and i too, hate seeing it come out of my paycheck. (whether for americans or not, i still think it's wrong) but, previously there was a comment about illegal nicaraguans paying in to S.S, and not receiving it back, because they are illegal, i'm sorry, but i believe that comment would be better left unsaid, want to know why? if the you wern't illegal, you would be able to recieve that money. sorry but that is the truth. Lorena

Taxing

I do not think you understand how or why money is collected, and how it is then expended, and why it is expended, and the principles behind the whole "process". If someone were to make an argument that illegal people in the U.S. cost U.S. tax-payers a ton of money (and it is a fact that they do), it is pointless for someone to start talking about lazy legal people in the U.S. It is a 100% completely different matter (it is quite possible for people to believe they should not have to pay for either thing, but definitely not the former). Even if it is true, it is irrelevant to the topic at hand. It is also irrelevant to a discussion of legal and illegal people in a country, that legal immigrants do pay taxes. Hopefully, they do. But, that money is hardly simply some weird trade-off to cover the costs of the illegal people there. It is a matter of citizenship -- that is why they pay taxes, and expending them is and should be tied to this citizenship principle, too. And, telling someone that if their tax money was not used on programs for immigrants or aliens, that it might instead be used for military purposes (the throwing of bombs), is also pointless. Again, this might in fact be true, but it has nothing to do with discussion. They are independent matters; there is no cause-and-effect nor dependence between the domestic social program and the international military venture. It is simply, completely illogical to collapse them into a single matter. Your whole post is confused. Yes, tax money collected will almost surely be expended on something, but it does not follow from that, that every possible thing they could spend it on is equally good, or that the money should or could be used for programs benefiting illegal people in the U.S. The idea that since funding a war is worse than funding a program for illegal people in the U.S., that it is therefore a good thing to fund a program for people who are in the U.S. illegally, is just silly. There are 1000`s of things which could be done with the money, not just a handful of things. If you think people in the U.S. should fund programs for illegal workers there, then you need to actually make a logical argument which demonstrates why a legal U.S. worker should pay taxes to help an illegal worker who is inside the U.S. Pretty tough challenge that will be. There is no shortage of U.S. government help for people who emigrate there legally, and there are good reasons for those programs. The arguments which support those programs, do not also work for people who go there illegally. The key part of any phrase describing people there without legitimate papers is ILLEGAL; the immigrant or worker or alien parts is a distant second.

confusing

Carina, it seems you did not understand my argument and you are replying to something else. Since Chela brought up the topic of taxes and how much illegal immigrants were costing her. I was saying that there are illegal immigrants that work hard just as there are illegal immigrants that don't. A lot of illegal immigrants pay taxes and they also contribute to Social Security (estimated 7 billion a year which they don't get back because they use fake socials) so that should offset the cost of illegal immigrants. I was also pointing out that She would be paying taxes regardless of illegal immigration. People here in the USA make it sound as if they are working harder to pay for the illegal immigrants and they have to work hard regardless.

Everytime I go to a Restaurant in LA, I just have to look around and see who is preparing the food...guess who? for the most part illegal immigrants. If you drive around and see constructions sites or gardening workers you will see immigrants doing the work and alot of them came here illegally. Oh and guess who pick the vegetables and fruit getting payed really low wages...So it would be nice to read/hear a more grateful attitude towards the people who is willing to do the dirty work that the "rightfull Americans" are not willing to do.

People here always talk/write about how much illegal immigrants cost to the tax payers but they don't talk about how much illegal immigrants payed in taxes and how much they contribute to the economy.

Real Taxes, Real Costs

It is an old and unverifiable belief that the taxes paid by illegal workers covers the benefits received by illegal workers. Any serious analysis of the problem shows clearly that the opposite is true. The definitive study was by the Natioanl Academy of Sciences, which, with meticulous documenation of everything, shows the benefits grossly exceed the costs, even if you figure it the taxes paid by the illegal workers; this is true in every State in the U.S. Even ultra-liberal, pro-Hispanic, pro-illegal worker California (in 2004) found the same when they initiated their own study a year ago. Califorina researchers found that after subtracting the tax contributions of illegal alien workers, the expenditures for them exceeded $9 billion per year (note, billion, not million). Their math showed this to be, in effect, a financial penalty of almost $1200, for every legal, California household. If you sit down and study the real costs, they are staggering. California alone spends nearly $8 billion dollars on educational services for the children of illegal aliens. All taxes paid by illegal aliens do not even cover the incarceration costs of illegal aliens, but it wouldn`t matter much if it did because health care and education are the big ticket costs. In the end there might be many cultural or even some economic benefits to having a small, or even a large illegal alien population in the U.S., but one will never make such a case by trying to state some trade-off in terms of costs regarding the collection and distribution of tax dollars. This just will not work, not because of some political bias, but because mathematically, the numbers have never revealked this, and it isn`t even clear such a thing could even be economically possible.

Why illegals?

The west coast of the US is full of illegals from Latin America from Southern California to Eastern Washington. I see a lot of focus on the costs of them being there but little on the benefits.

Many illegals do jobs that natives refuse to do or refuse to do for the same wages. The same is true of Nicaraguans in Costa Rica. For example, much of the Costa Rican coffee is picked by Nicaraguans.

If illegals "refused to be there", the price of coffee from Costa Rica would go up as would apples from Washington, ... Thus, the "government costs" of supporting the illegals is, in many cases, a subsidy for agriculture and, ultimately, prices you pay the the grocery store.

The obvious parallel is the "cost of the drug war". The reason cocaine is produced in Columbia, Bolivia and Peru is because there is a market in the U.S. So, once again, you need to look at the consumer end.

Price subsidy via illegals?

I think there are many, or even countless examples in which while one might assume that the use of illegals results in a lower price for things, in effect a subsidy, I am not so sure how often this happens, for the end-product comsumer.

I think often the cost is stationary, and the use of the illegal workers simply results in greater profit for the corporation or business, not necessarily the consumer. One thing not talked about all that often in the U.S., is that after someone outsources a field/line, or after they move the plant to China or Brazil or wherever, or after an occupation is suspected to be more than 50% or even 75% undocumented workers, is that the cost of the end-product is usually the same.

They take the tool making outfit from union-based Ohio to dirt-cheap Brazil, but the $22 tool when made in Ohio, still costs $22 when made in Brazil, so no savings go the consumner way, only the corp way. Same with many fields of undocumented workers. The garage costs $x in a state with little known use of undocumented workers, but in a nearby state with many, many undocumented workers in this field, the same garage costs $x. The difference is that the owner using the undocumented workers simply makes and keeps more money, per job.

Food might be different, and I am not an expert on this. But, my guess would be that the consumer payoff, for any average individual consumer, is rather tiny, maybe even miniscule when compared to the average U.S. home income. It is probably there, but I doubt many people would consider it an important benefit to them, personally (there is no doubt in the world it is a huge benefit to business / corporations).

Conclusion

Conclusion

The illegal immigration in the United States benefits only “Corporate America” which is who rules the country, therefore the country DOES benefit from illegal immigration after all.

The ones that see this issue as a sore subject must be the ones that don’t benefit from it at all.

I personally remain skeptical about who hurts whom the most. The illegal immigrant that stands at the freeway intersection holding bags of oranges for sale OR the born citizen that hangs around the same freeway intersection begging for change but only holding a cardboard sign that reads in perfect English: “Homeless, Please Help. God Bless”

Huh, makes you think doesn’t it?

Well Said!

Your Conclusion was perfect, the only thing I think needs to be added (not really, I was just so entusiastic about your posting I had to embellish it) .....

The illegal immigration in the United States benefits only “Corporate America” which is who rules the country .....

Please Change this to

The illegal immigration in the United States benefits only “Corporate America” which is who rules the WORLD.

Yes, and No (maybe)

I agree with what you say, but not perhaps with every conclusion one might draw from these things. I think, as noted in another related post here, that the laws definitely are selectively enforced. I also think that many apsects of immigration law and enforcement of it, is purposfully done, and that you are absolutely correct that what it amounts to is a subsidy for select businesses - which results, usually, in lower costs to consumers for certain goods or services.

But, this is not necessarily a benefit to the country (it need not be a good thing for the country that my grapefruit or roast beef costs 14% less than it otherwise might). The costs of using illegal workers tends not to be handled by the companies or people who most benefit from illegal workers -- and therin lies the rub, politically, and when it comes time to collect and expend tax moneys.

It is true that illegal workers tend to gravitate towards certain occupations (for various reasons). In some areas, they make up -or so I have read- well over half of the workforce in that area (recent newspaper stories I have seen listed 65% of the people in some food industries and construction are illegal). People see this, and then say "undocumented workers just work jobs American citizens do not want".

But, if 65% of the roofers out West -for the sake of argument- are illegal workers, then who are the other 35%? Well, they are legal workers. But, who are they, really? Most studies show they are poor(er) native born citizens, a high percentage of whom are minorities, and also recent legal immigrants lacking the equivalent of a U.S. high school degree.

I undestand what you say regarding costs, demands, migrating workers and drugs (fight against). It all makes sense to me. I mention the work stats above because if you understand economics and why people move and work, then it is a small step towards admitting wage depression is true, and illegal workers cause/contribute to this, and legal workers, especially poor legal workers, suffer the most from this.

As long as some contractor can get a huge number of illegal workers, he will not increase the salary for that position, and ulitmately might even be able to lower it. If illegal workers were far, far fewer in number, employers would compete more for workers, instead of workers "competing" by accepting very low salaries. Having a non-stop supply of cheap labor might make some products cost less to consumers, but having this labor supply makes life far harder for poor people here legally (most studies show that it is people lacking a high school diploma, minorities, and recent legal immigrants who suffer most).

It is not a given that people would always prefer the cheapest food or roof or whatever, if they were made fully aware of what other costs are associated with the "system". The selective enforcement of laws makes their choices more complicated, seems to encourage egoism, and basically turns the matter into a collective-action problem.

Well...

Well ... I understand what you say, and probably what you mean (and might even sympathize with some or much of it), but ... In this reply you claim that the are hard-working and not-hard-working illegal workers. I agree, and at times in my life I have been a hard-working "illegal alien".

But, in any political discussion, to anyone not already predisposed to believe what you believe, it is more or less irrelevant because they do not want illegal workers in their country, regardless of how honest or hard-working they are. Since they are illegal, and they do not want them there (which is to say they want their immigration laws enforced), to them it doesnt matter what subcategory they are in. Now, it might be true that parts of the U.S. economy would collapse without the illegal workers. But, to someone who wants immigration laws strictly enforced, they are willing to pay that price, as they usually believe it will force their government to rethink various policies, including immigration.

Of course, it is true, that many illegal workers pay taxes. But, to someone who doesnt want illegal workers in their country, this tax-paying fact is, to them, not the most important thing. They want their tax money to pe paid by citizens, and expended on citizens. They do not want the illegal workers there, even if they do pay taxes. It is not true that all the workers with fake SSN cards pay enough to offset the costs of illegal immigrants; in terms of education, health care, and incarceration (just to mention three areas), it is not true. But, again, to many people who do not want illegal aliens in their country, they do not care even if those tax-payments did offset the losses. People in the U.S. may speak as if they believe they need to work harder to pay for illegals (and many or most might even actually believe that -- I do not know), but often if you listen closely to what educated people say, they often object not because they feel they have to work extra hard, but because they want money expended on their own citizens, not on people pretending to be citizens with fake identification.

I am not sure how you can tell, by looking at them, if workers in L.A. are illegal. They might be, or most even might be, but I do not believe you can tell that with any degree of accuracy. There are many legal aliens working hard, side by side, with illegal aliens. The idea that all, or most, crappy work in the U.S. is done by illegals is simply not true. If someone in the U.S. legally, believes that workers should not be their in the U.S. illegally, it will be hard to make them more grateful by listing the good things people their illegally, have done. Since they do not want them there at all, they are not interested in the details of what they do after they get there. It might not be fair, and it might not be good policy, and it might not make sense to you, but there isn`t anything illogical about that belief (personally, I do not share it, but it is very, very common in the U.S.).

Lola, well said!

You and I keep trying to tell people to see the other side of the coin but it's no use. People will only see what they want.

I am not even trying to gain any sympathy towards illegals, all I keep asking for is FAIRNESS.

But it's no use!

Condescending of Immigrants

Lola, stop "perceiving" and trying to find a interlineal conspiracy (Again). The big sign, it was intended as a metaphorical example of the United States Government’s inept enforcement of its own laws, to such a point that there might as well be a Billboard. Then again, after reading your antarchistical theory, you specifically mention immigration and land ownership, this might be a conversation we should agree, to disagree. What do you see as solutions to this problem, from both a immigrants perspective as well as the citizens of a country in which that individual wishes to move. You know one thing I found very interesting is that Mexico and Costa Rica make it very difficult for people to get a visa, especially for people from the C-8. Is this just the US?

Finally if you’re looking for my apology for being politically incorrect or saying things that might be offensive to you or people of immigrant background, then your in for a long wait. My great grandparents names are both etched in a memorial located on Ellis Island. I know all about immigrant families, I grew up in one. The other side of the family has been here apparently from the beginning, yes both side of the coin. Please don’t patronize us in your assumption that we might not understand what people are up against when they want to come to this country. The Attorney General is from an immigrant family. Oh, now you’re going to say he is Bush's token Mexican.

My mother in-law comes from Iran, and is now a Citizen. When she arrived legally in this country, she spent 15 years working three jobs and going to school at night so she could learn English. She took classes to get her GED, she is now attending college classes. She applied for and took classes in order to get her citizenship and on the day she received her citizenship was beaming. We were so proud of her; it was a defining moment in all of our lives. She was alone, a woman with little to no education, didn’t speak English and didn’t have a dime to her name; she had a dream, worked hard and played by the rules and has realized many of the dreams she had.

Lola, are you here legally? If you are, after reading your dissertation I would then wonder, why did you bother? If you are, you should be proud of the fact that you did things the right way, if not, then I can see why your panties might be in such a knot.

Immigration

http://www.eco-tropicalresorts.com/

First of all I'd like to say it is a pleasure to be on a board where such a discussion can be overall civil.

I believe it is about fairness to all. And the US government is at the root of the unfairness. I don't believe that the government is inept at enforcing it's laws. I believe they are selective and purposeful in it's enforcement. It does so at the behest of business in order to control wages when the "free market" threatens to tilt the status quo. For example, companies are allowed to recruit and import nurses because of the so called shortage, when in fact it is estimated that 50% of all US nurses do not work in the profession. Companies declaring a shortage of nurses get tax breaks of all sorts to attract foreign nurses....which keeps wages in check. I have worked at hospitals that had massive layoffs, and not one foreign nurse was laid off---only the homegrown nurses. I don't hold it against foreign nurses, I'd follow the carrot everytime myself.

Government turns a blind eye to those illegally crossing the border, and Bushie says that workers coming to the country do the jobs nobody else will do. My truth says that the real reason is that US companies don't want to disturb their bottom line while sticking increased profits in their pockets. US citizens will demand benefits, expect certain protections like prevailing wages. The worker who does not have the right papers will not squeal as loud as the one who does, when stepped on.

Fairness .... well ... I have seen the guy who arrives on Sunday who on Monday is working in the cafe or pushing a ice cream cart. Now it seems that it would only be fair if I could arrive in the Central American country of my dreams and be selling a great cheeseburger from my homemade grill on the street corner the next day. Would there be a wink and a turned head allowing that? I don't think so.